Westminster Medical Group, a top UK hair transplant clinic located in London’s prestigious Harley Street district, specializes in delivering natural-looking hair, beard, and eyebrow transplant surgeries, as well as scalp micropigmentation and non-surgical hair loss solutions. With a modern surgical center, they also provide 0% finance options to make hair restoration accessible to more patients.
One key aspect in hair transplantation is the choice between manual and motorised techniques, both aimed at restoring hair by transferring healthy follicles from donor to recipient areas. Here’s how these two methods compare:
Manual Hair Transplant Technique
The manual approach, commonly through Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE), involves a surgeon extracting each follicle with precision, using tools like micropunches. This offers high control, reducing damage to follicles and often resulting in natural-looking results. However, it’s a skill-intensive, time-consuming method, requiring expertise to perform effectively, especially in larger transplant cases. While time-consuming, manual techniques are less invasive and cause minimal disruption to surrounding tissue.
Motorised Hair Transplant Technique
Motorised techniques, such as motorised FUE or robotic-assisted FUE, enhance speed by using automated devices for extraction. This approach allows for consistent speed and depth, reducing surgeon fatigue and allowing quicker procedures. However, motorised techniques can increase the risk of follicle damage if not handled carefully, especially by less experienced practitioners.
Ultimately, the choice between manual and motorised techniques depends on your unique needs, the expertise of the surgeon, and the desired transplant size. Patients can book a free consultation at Westminster Medical Group to explore the best option for their situation.
Read our manual hair transplant reviews and see how Westminster Medical Group combines precision with advanced techniques to help clients achieve their hair restoration goals.
Admin